You are here

The choir school regulations of 1460 and the cultivation of polyphony

Reinhard Strohm

The Viennese municipal Cantorey ordinance for St Stephen’s, dated 24 September 1460 )[104], followed the municipal school ordinance of 1446 in a similar way as, in the history of the offices themselves, the cantor’s position (1267) followed that of the schoolmaster (1237): a more detailed scheme was derived from a broader framework. Such service ordinances must be examined particularly in terms of their position within temporal continuities: what innovations do they introduce or resist, what traditions do they affirm or oppose?[105] The Viennese Cantorey ordinance was certainly part of a broader trend among church administrations to respond to newer demands in musical practice with regulatory measures—thus acting restrictively or only cautiously encouraging. The ordinance addresses not only school discipline and organisation but also the musical repertoire, which evidently could be subject to debate. All pupils were to be trained in “cantus gregorianus” and “Conducten” (conductus). Gregorian chant was to be performed in church according to fixed distribution rules. By conductus, sacred songs were meant, which the poor pupils sang for money in front of houses during festive seasons (» E. Bozen/Bolzano; » H. Children’s Processions). In contrast, musically gifted pupils were to be trained in “cantus figurativus” (i.e. polyphony). And polyphonic singing was now required of them for the major feasts of Christmas, Easter and Pentecost. It is clear that the Cantorey ordinance did not seek to introduce something entirely new, but rather to regulate an already existing practice: the tradition of polyphonic singing, which had probably been in place for years (at the latest since Edlerawer). Its unchecked growth was now to be curbed—for example, by ensuring that only truly talented pupils were trained in it. The board set up in the Cantorey building in 1457 can be interpreted as a teaching aid for polyphonic singing and mensural notation, while the two reading desks installed in the school in 1461, used by the subcantor for instruction, served the “simpler” Gregorian chant (cantus planus), which was also sung in church from choir desks.

Polyphonic repertoire already existed at the civic school around 1410–1420, but at that time it was almost exclusively of foreign origin and cultivated by an elite (» K. The Viennese Codex of c. 1415). Edlerawer’s work, however, marks a phase of extensive collecting and original composition of polyphonic pieces for the representative functions of the Cantorey. All surviving and attributed compositions by Edlerawer are preserved in a single musical source, the “St Emmeram Codex” (» D-Mbs Clm 14274); this was at least begun in Vienna during his tenure as cantor (» E. Transmission of Viennese church music). It thus appears that the cantor influenced the creation of this collection and that the pieces recorded there reflect his musical liturgical duties at St Stephen’s. More than that, they define the musical capabilities of the pupil choir he trained—perhaps in such a way that not all pieces were intended for all choirboys, and that there were various levels and groupings of ability. This would be a principle also pursued by the school ordinance of 1446 for general subjects.

The Cantorey ordinance solidified the division of pupil groups into “general musicians” and polyphony specialists. Since cantus figurativus derived its name from the rhythmically fixed (mensural) note forms, the figurae, it did not include, for example, the non-mensurally notated monastic polyphony (» A. Klösterliche Mehrstimmigkeit: Arten und Kontexte) which is also attested at St Stephen’s under the name “Discantus” (cf. Ch. Tropes and other marginal phenomena in the Ordo of St Stephen’s). Only figured, mensural polyphony was conceptually and didactically treated as a distinct category—not the other forms of polyphony, which may have been practised frequently and informally, even by the general choir. This distinction can now be applied to the Cantorey’s book inventory of 1476. For the individual volume of the churchwarden’s accounts of St Stephen’s preserved by chance from that year[106] lists on fols. 184v–185r:

“die puecher, so der cantor hat in der cantorei:
In dem kar: ain Gradual, ain Salve puech, ain Passional.
In dem haus: zwai Gradual, zwen antiphonarii, dreu grosse Cancional des Hermans, ain gross Cancional des Jacobem, sechs klaine Cancional, ain rats Cancional mit ettlichen sexstern [these six words are crossed out], ain rats Cancional des Jacobem, ain alts Cancional mit ettlichen Sextern, klaine puechl mit proficein, das register des cantor.”
(The books that the cantor has in the Cantorey:
In the choir: one Gradual, one Salve book, one Passional.
In the house: two Graduals, two Antiphonaries, three large Cancionals by Hermann, one large Cancional by Jacob, six small Cancionals, one red Cancional with several sexterns [these six words are crossed out], one red Cancional by Jacob, one old Cancional with several sexterns, small booklets with Proficia, the cantor’s register.)

The three large Cancionals are certainly to be attributed to Hermann Edlerawer, while the large and the red one “des Jacobem” refer to Jacob Gressing von Fladnitz, the former rector of the civic school.[107] The books attributed to them—i.e. evidently personally overseen by them—are exclusively designated as “Cancional”, and thus distinguished from the chant manuscripts (Antiphonale, Graduale, Passionale, etc.), some of which were kept in the church itself (in the choir). In 1455, the organist of Trent, Johannes Lupi—who had himself previously studied in Vienna—bequeathed his six-book collection of “cantionalia vel figuratus cantus” ( Cancionals, or cantus figuratus) to the parish church in Bolzano, using the terms “cancionale” and “figuratus cantus” almost synonymously in his will (» G. Johannes Lupi). If one accepts this nomenclature, then a total of five large and six small volumes in the Cantorey library of 1476 may have contained mensural polyphony—while the only other item, “ain alts Cancional mit ettlichen Sextern” (an old Cancional with several sexterns), was probably described as “old” precisely because its content was not mensural. It may further be assumed that the collecting and composing of mensural church music did not cease after Edlerawer’s departure, and that other cantors and subcantors were creatively involved in it. For the question of surviving musical sources from Vienna generally, see » E. Transmission of Viennese church music.

[104] Text provided, among others, in Mantuani 1907, 285–287; see also Gruber 1995, 199; Flotzinger 2014, 58 f.